Dow
Jones
10129.83
+35.77
11:44
am PST, July 20, 2004
NASDAQ
1907.20
+23.37
For
info, visit access.smallcapnetwork.com
S
& P 500
1106.66
+5.76
To
be removed, please click
here
Russell
2000
561.12
+6.39
VOLUME
04: ISSUE 55
Feature:
The 3 M's. Martha, Microsoft, Markets.
Martha
(NYSE: MSO) should
just do her time. All this theater regarding appeals and false bravado
will do little more than damage the company she apparently holds so dear.
My understanding is that under Federal Law, if she went in August 1st and
kept her proverbial nose clean, she'd likely be home for Christmas.
And if she wants to clear her name,
she can do it that after.
In our March
9th Martha piece, we suggested that the then $8-$9 level was likely
the bottom. Now, as the shares burble around $11, the question arises where
do they go now? Technically, the shares would have to break $13.70 to herald
a new up-leg. The downside seems to be in that previously noted $8-$9 area.
We also noted then that a prudent put purchase for insurance purposes might
be advisable. Might be wise again, for new purchases.
As we speak, any one who hasn't heard
of Martha--we don't even have to use her last name anymore--has likely been
in a cloistered monastery for the last several years. And, although the
company has been pounded both in influence and revenues, I believe that
the sun will rise again, at least for those investors who can take the
ongoing heat.
Here are the stats. The company has
cash on hand of $166 million (as at March 31/04). No debt. Revenues projections
for fiscal 2004 are $192 million, off from $245 million in fiscal 2003.
The company is also projected to lose nearly $1 a share for 2004. In 2005
there seems to be a renaissance. Revenues are forecasted at $210 million
and earnings, while paltry at 3 cents a shares looks interesting when you
consider that the company lost 4 cents in fiscal 2003.
Interestingly, the very few analysts--WallStreet
has all but abandoned coverage--who post numbers for the company classify
MSO as a screaming sell. Can you say contrary indicator? Lest we forget,
this is the same Wall Street that has had Intel (NASDAQ:
INTC) as a screaming buy all through the nasty semiconductor decline.
INTC shares are off almost 25 percent since February. But then, as we noted
on February
25th, we've always disliked Intel.
Martha's brand is solid, if slightly
tarnished. The reality is that she didn't hurt anyone but herself. Michael
Moore isn't planning a tell-all documentary. The faithful will continue
buying and new customers will just have to stop and take a look at the
goods. Advertisers will return in the fullness of time. And Martha will
eventually look out at us from behind her snappy kitchen counter once again.
Conclusion? MSO will see the light likely over the next 12-24 months.
Or maybe sooner if she'd just shut
up and do her time.
Mr.
Softee.
Ah, Microsoft (NASDAQ:
MSFT). Ironically, while it represents the poster stock that is
politically correct to dislike, it has over the last three years been delivering
success that is virtually impossible to argue with. Can it grow bigger?
Of course it can. With a current market cap of $300 billion, I sincerely
believe that over the next 10-20 years, this may well be the first trillion-dollar
market cap company. At $28 dollars, the shares are at pre- 2000 price levels
and half their high of $60 during the heady days of the bubble.
We like MSFT. We alerted readers
to the shares on March
25th at $24.90. Even though the shares have moved up 12 percent
since then, we think readers should own at least a small core position
for the long term. The shares have been stuck in a range of between $24-$28.
MSFT had a nice run starting in mid-May, which ended in early July. We
feel that the shares have since pulled back nicely and appear to be creating
higher lows after a bit of consolidation. We like the upside here and if
it can break above $30 it has a lot of room to run--a very nice longer term
hold with limited downside.
On the horizon, MSFT's $60 billion
of cash--which represents about $5 a share and no debt either, by the way--has
fixated investors and analysts. Rumors of a decent dividend increase, maybe
a special payment, and a host of other potentials abound. The bottom line
is that it won't do anything stupid with the money and will undoubtedly
use at least a significant portion for the benefit of shareholders.
More stats. Projected revenues and
earnings for fiscal 2005 are $37 billion and $1.34 a share respectively.
(In fiscal 2003, those comparable numbers were $32 billion and 93 cents
per share). At $28, the shares throw off a very compelling projected price
earnings ratio of 21 times. Although growth is projected at 10 percent
for next year versus 14 for 2004, I suspect it will be higher for 2005.
Look for the shares to break $30. That should portend decent growth and
a further price rise to--at the very least--a higher trading range.
The
whole Nasd'y market.
I'd be thrilled to report that our
assessment on May
21st has changed. It hasn't. Therefore, I'll be mercifully brief.
The Comp has been stuck in a range
between 1850 and 2000 for what seems an eternity. Patience is the best
weapon at the moment. Our feeling then that the NASDAQ would touch 2000
and pullback came to pass. Currently, we'd like to see this consolidation
continue at least and build a stronger base. The critical support level
is 1850-1860. If that level is breached, we could move, short term, into
the 1700 range.
It's hard to know what's worse; a
volatile market or a range bound market. No matter. Raising some cash would
be good and selective buying of favored names --especially some in our universe--makes
sense as we wait for resolution, hopefully to the upside.
No doubt, this is a tough market,
especially for smallcaps. We've been here before, as you have.
It won't last forever and we believe
that in the not too distant future, today's prices--which could go lower
first--will look cheap.
Equities are virtually the only commodity
consumers eschew when they're cheap or at least on significant sale.
I've never understood that.
We
Value Your Feedback
Got comments, questions or suggestions?
Send 'em on over:
Editor@smallcapnetwork.com
If you wish to send a written request
or inquiry, please send it to our physical address:
TGR Group, LLC
3525 Del Mar Heights Rd #334
San Diego, CA 92130
Unsubscribe
Here
D I S C
L A I M E R :
The
SmallCap Digest is an independent electronic publication committed to providing
our readers with factual information on selected publicly traded
companies. SmallCap Digest is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer.
All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and
other pertinent criteria with a view toward maximizing the upside
potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.
Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from
third party consultants and/or companies which it features for the publication
and circulation of the SmallCap Digest or representation on SmallCapNetwork.net.
Likewise, this newsletter is owned by TGR, LLC. To the degrees enumerated
herein, this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent
publication.
Click
Here to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered,
or visit the following web address: http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/compensation_disclosure.html
for our full compensation disclosure and http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/short_term_alerts.html
for Trading Alerts compensation and disclosure. TGR Group LLC has not been
compensated for this report.
All statements
and expressions are the sole opinions of the editors and are subject
to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a
company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or
sell any securities mentioned. While we believe all sources of information
to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the
accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein.
The editor,
members of the editor's family, and/or entities with which the editor
is affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise
trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication
unless specifically disclosed in the newsletter. The profiles, critiques,
and other editorial content of the SmallCap Digest and SmallCapNetwork.net
may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities
of the companies mentioned herein.
THE READER
SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING
IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE
AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE
IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE
COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE EDITORS OF SMALLCAPNETWORK.NET.
We encourage
our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available
at the web sites of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National
Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com.
We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors
concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm
. Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR
page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at
its web site.