Dow
Jones
9892.75
-38.07
9:22
am PST, December 5, 2003
NASDAQ
1950.04
-18.76
For
info, visit access.smallcapnetwork.com
S
& P 500
1065.61
-4.10
To
be removed, please click
here
Russell
2000
540.70
-3.45
VOLUME
03: ISSUE 78
Feature:
Got Due Diligence? Part One.
If
you lined up 5 car chassis, one right next to the other, could you tell
which would end up as a Porsche and which one a Yugo? No, you couldn't.
So it is, as well, with stock Due Diligence.
The standard definition of Due Diligence
goes something like this: "The process of investigation, performed by investors,
into the details of a potential investment, such as an examination of operations
and management and the verification of material facts." Whatever.
For investors, the real definition
lies here: the practice of researching a stock to the point where an investor
feels comfortable committing a portion of available capital into a --hopefully--
profitable situation.
Certainly, this validation process,
carefully carried out, will go a long way to insulating investors against
ugly and potentially wealth destroying opportunities.
That
said, all the due diligence on an individual stock won't help if the overall
market is uncooperative. Analogous to stocks in a falling market, when
the cops raid a brothel everybody goes downtown. And there we have the
major mistake made by most investors: choosing a stock without first doing
market
due diligence.
At SmallCap Digest, we begin our
due diligence on a favored stock only after we ascertain the state of the
markets. Period. There is too much risk and too many factors working at
cross-purposes to have blind faith in a good stock in a bad market.
Since March of this year, the markets
have been pretty darned good. Back then, it took stones to step into the
market. Curiously, even though the NASDAQ is up about 45 percent since
March
12th, I still see articles postulating as to whether it's time
to get into the market. There are always opportunities, no matter the state
of the market.
However, before picking a stock to
invest in now, the fact that the easy money's already been made must be
factored into any discussion of due diligence. Both the DOW and the NASDAQ
are bouncing off their century marks of 10,000 and 2,000 respectively.
To begin a research regimen, investors must ascertain what percentage the
market has already priced in--or at least discounted--to what appears to
be decent economic growth ahead.
It's important to note that the past
year has been ugly, both economically and geo-politically. The current
debt is huge, deficits are growing, the recovery is more than jobless and
overseas military campaigns appear bogged down. And still, the markets
continue to advance. Markets tend to see ahead. So should investors.
Markets foreshadow or predict, they
don't--with some minor blips-- react to current events.
Buy when everyone's selling and sell
when everyone's buying--probably the most consistent way to profitable investing.
Historically, the value of that approach is irrefutable.
Intel
(NASDAQ:
INTC) has apparently replaced GM (NYSE:
GM) and IBM (NYSE:
IBM) as the markets' bellwether. Intel's vacillations have largely
replaced market due diligence, as analysts and the media spend inordinate
amounts of bandwidth commenting on every twitch and exhalation of the chip
giant, and attempt to relate its singularities to the progress of the overall
market . While of some value, this myopic fixation is dangerous. Pinning
the hopes of thousands of stocks constituting dozens of sectors to Intel
means investors will likely miss tons of other opportunities and may well
get bushwhacked if this one stock does a market head-fake.
If
you want to invest in Intel because the market looks good, fine. If you
invest in the market because Intel looks fine, you'll undoubtedly get nailed
somewhere down the road.
So how do you read the market? First
you have to determine your risk tolerance. If you feel the market is oversold,
are you prepared to wade in and be too early? Is there room to move higher
after an already significant move? These are personal determinations, and
relate to each investor's circumstances. Don't let a TV talking head tell
you what to do.
Then, watch the sentiment numbers--the
Market Volatility Index (VIX)
is one of my favorites. A low number means the market should cruise higher
because investors feel complacent. In March the VIX was in the 30's and
everyone was scared. Since then it has fallen to 16 and everyone feels
relatively good about investing. While investors should be aware of this
sea change, the bon temps can go on for a while. As long as the VIX roils
around below 20, the market will remain fairly friendly. Although, as noted
above, the easy money's likely already been made.
In conclusion, get a read on the
whole market before you focus on a stock--or stocks-- to purchase. This
way, you'll be on your way to choosing the Porsches as opposed to the Yugos.
Like the market? Fine. We'll look
at how to do due diligence on a stock against that backdrop in a future
piece.
If
You Haven't Already, Sign up for your FREE
Preferred Membership!
Over
the past year, we've brought you 13 Trading
Alerts. If you had invested $1000 in each one, your $13,000 investment
would have grown to $23070, if you had sold, say, Friday November 7th,
to pick a day. That's a 78 percent return in a less than a year.
The best? Obviously, Cel-Sci. The worst? ThinkPath. If we strip those two
out--the highest and lowest returns--the return on your $11,000 investment
would have been a very respectable 51 percent. Not too shabby.
By comparison, the S&P index
has returned about 20 percent over the last year. The NASDAQ--to which we
also alerted you at the low in March 2003--has returned around 40 percent
in the same period. The NASDAQ Tracker (NASDAQ:
QQQ) did slightly better than its benchmark having risen 45 percent.
Oh yes, we told you about that one, too at $24 in February 2003. Now it's
$35.
And we're only looking at Trading
Alerts. I suspect if we included all of our Company Profiles (check
our Track Record), the numbers would likely have been even better.
The
best is yet to come. Sign up NOW!
Joining our NEW Preferred Member
Program is easy and simple. Just follow this quick two-step process:
Opt-in your email address, then, make sure and confirm the request for
confirmation you will receive in your inbox. That's it! You'll automatically
be in position to start receiving these new special features available
only to Preferred Members!
To subscribe to the preferred member
list, simply click
here. Or, to subscribe by email, send a blank email to scn-preferred-subscribe@delta.levelogic.com.
If there is a problem with the subscription or you do not receive a confirmation
email within 2 hours, go to http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/pref-sub.html
and submit your email address.
We
Value Your Feedback
Got comments, questions or suggestions?
Send 'em on over:
Editor@smallcapnetwork.com
Unsubscribe
Here
D I S C
L A I M E R :
The
SmallCap Digest is an independent electronic publication committed to providing
our readers with factual information on selected publicly traded
companies. SmallCap Digest is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer.
All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and
other pertinent criteria with a view toward maximizing the upside
potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.
Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from
third party consultants and/or companies which it features for the publication
and circulation of the SmallCap Digest or representation on SmallCapNetwork.net.
Likewise, this newsletter is owned by TGR, LLC. To the degrees enumerated
herein, this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent
publication.
Click
Here to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered,
or visit the following web address: http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/compensation_disclosure.html
for our full compensation disclosure and http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/short_term_alerts.html
for Trading Alerts compensation and disclosure. TGR Group LLC has not been
compensated for this report.
All statements
and expressions are the sole opinions of the editors and are subject
to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a
company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or
sell any securities mentioned. While we believe all sources of information
to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the
accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein.
The editor,
members of the editor's family, and/or entities with which the editor
is affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise
trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication
unless specifically disclosed in the newsletter. The profiles, critiques,
and other editorial content of the SmallCap Digest and SmallCapNetwork.net
may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities
of the companies mentioned herein.
THE READER
SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING
IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE
AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE
IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE
COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE EDITORS OF SMALLCAPNETWORK.NET.
We encourage
our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available
at the web sites of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National
Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com.
We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors
concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm
. Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR
page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at
its web site.