News Details – Smallcapnetwork
Feature: CSCO - The Sky is Falling. Whatever.
/

February 2, 2024

/

PDT

Dow Jones 10499.03 -6.15 9:05 am PST, February 4, 2004  NASDAQ 2036.32 -29.89 For info, visit access.smallcapnetwork.com S & P 500 1131.27 -4.76 To be removed, please click here Russell 2000 571.70 -7.45 VOLUME 04: ISSUE 8  Feature: CSCO - The Sky is Falling. Whatever. Apparently, the sky is falling, courtesy of Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO). Oh, please... The California-based tech behemoth reported earnings and gave guidance that displeased the intelligentsia, so down we all go we're told. I smell opportunity, and soon. NOTE: Keep an eye on your inbox, Friday. We are going to profile a very nifty manufacturing company with tentacles in the Police/ Fire/Safety and Homeland Security markets. We believe that this company has a great future and the right products to profit significantly from the rise in national security spending. A year ago, Cisco was trading at under $15. As of the open, Wednesday, the shares had weakened from $26 to under $24.75. That means that folks who took the risk early in 2003 are still up almost 100 percent. Sell some? Sure. Sell the market? I think not. CNBC has made the trivial travails of CSCO its mantra today. As usual, it replaced journalism with knee jerk and reactionary reporting. And will likely keep CSCO front and center--at least until the next 'catastrophe' comes along. You be the Judge... Cisco reported earnings of 10 cents a share due to an accounting charge for its second quarter (as at December 31). Otherwise the number would have been 18 cents. Analysts wanted 17 cents. Sales were $5.4 billion, up 15 percent over the same period 2003. Analysts wanted $5.29 billion. This makes the seventh consecutive quarter Cisco has reported sales in excess of $1 billion. Although Cisco effectively beat expectations, CEO John Chambers made a statement that mentioned that CEO's were still cautious about spending and hiring. Inflammatory? Market correcting? Merely seems a responsible observation by my read. I'd rather have my CEO cautious than espousing unrealistic expectations. And for this the media and Wall Street spanks the stock and, by extension, the rest of the market? Unbelievable. Have we learned anything? Big cap investors could learn a lot from their smallcap brethren--patience, for one thing and, not to sound too ecclesiastical, a bit of faith. Those of us who watch the small cap market learn to take bad news in stride against the larger backdrop that will see a small company prosper through proper management and old-fashioned moxie. They stumble periodically on the path to success, which, may or may not be reflected, short-term, in the share price. Large caps, it seems, are not afforded the same courtesy; any 'bad news' is judged instantly and harshly with no eye to the big picture. It's darned  annoying. Would I buy Cisco here? Probably not, mainly because it isn't one I follow intently. That said, I could read its tea leaves just fine. Taking it out to the woodshed based on yesterday's news is simply an over-reaction. And trying to spin it as a negative market mover is nothing short of ludicrous. Remember: these are the same folks--analysts and media--who continually bring us a lukewarm reception for gains in the likes of Nortel, Lucent and Sun Micro. Pay attention, sure. But one quarter in one stock does not a market disaster make. Projections project more of the same. Earnings projections for CSCO vary slightly depending on where you look. For 2004 (as at July 31) and 2005 the numbers seem to percolate around 65 cents and 75 cents respectively. At $24.75, the shares throw off future price earnings of 38 times and 33 times. What that does tell me is that the shares may well have gotten a bit ahead of themselves from a valuation standpoint. Is it a catastrophe? The beginning of the end? Hardly. But I would be inclined to look elsewhere. And I would have said that before yesterday's earning's announcement.  The fortunes of large cap stocks are primarily a matter of perception and, unfortunately, general consensus. Short-term Cisco's shares will probably weaken a bit, but more because of an enthusiastic pre-existing valuation than any material developments. The market will quickly slough off Cisco's 'bad news'. As a matter of fact, it already has.   We Value Your Feedback Got comments, questions or suggestions? Send 'em on over: Editor@smallcapnetwork.com If you wish to send a written request or inquiry, please send it to our physical address: TGR Group, LLC 3525 Del Mar Heights Rd #334 San Diego, CA 92130 Unsubscribe Here D I S C L A I M E R : The SmallCap Digest is an independent electronic publication committed to providing our readers with factual information on selected  publicly traded companies. SmallCap Digest is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other pertinent criteria with a view toward  maximizing the upside potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.  Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from third party consultants and/or companies which it features for the publication and circulation of the SmallCap Digest or representation on SmallCapNetwork.net.  Likewise, this newsletter is owned by TGR, LLC.  To the degrees enumerated herein,  this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent publication. Click Here to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered, or visit the following web address:  http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/compensation_disclosure.html for our full compensation disclosure and http://access.smallcapnetwork.com/short_term_alerts.html for Trading Alerts compensation and disclosure. TGR Group LLC has not been compensated for this report. All statements and expressions are the sole  opinions of the editors and are subject to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities  mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein. The editor, members of the editor's family, and/or entities with  which the editor is affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication unless specifically disclosed in the newsletter. The profiles, critiques, and other editorial content of the SmallCap Digest and SmallCapNetwork.net may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein. THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN  SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN  CONSENT OF THE EDITORS OF SMALLCAPNETWORK.NET. We encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites of  the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com. We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at  http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm . Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at its web site.